• Call: +62
  • E-mail: sahita.institute@hints.id
Sahita Institure
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Campaign
    • Trade Justice
    • Digital Justice
    • Energy Transtition
  • Collective Idea
    • Visual Movement
    • Article
  • News
  • Publication
No Result
View All Result
Sahita Institute
No Result
View All Result

Indonesian National Critical Mineral Conference Produces Joint Communiqué

The Prabowo-Gibran Government Urged to Improve Governance and Mitigate Negative Impacts of the Nickel Downstream Industry in Indonesia

February 5, 2025
in Campaign, Energy Transtition
Home Campaign
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Palu/Jakarta, October 14, 2024 – The Indonesian National Critical Mineral Conference (KNMKI), held on October 9-10, has issued a joint communiqué urging all stakeholders in the critical minerals sector, particularly nickel, to prioritize human rights for marginalized social groups and to ensure sustainable environmental and social governance.

The communiqué emphasizes to the incoming Prabowo-Gibran administration, which will be inaugurated on October 20, that nickel downstream must not be used solely as a tool for economic growth. Field realities show many negative impacts that threaten the welfare of communities and the environment in areas surrounding nickel downstream operations.

Nickel downstream should be a strategic step to increase added value and create decent jobs. However, the government’s commitment to ensuring fair and sustainable growth remains in doubt. The joint communiqué, issued by more than 60 organizations/communities (civil society organizations, affected communities, and nickel processing industry workers’ unions), stresses that mineral resource management must consider the human rights of marginalized social groups and environmental impacts more seriously.

The conference chairperson and Executive Director of Transformasi untuk Keadilan (TuK) INDONESIA, Linda Rosalina, emphasized that this meeting is crucial with various organizations actively involved in advocacy, aiming to immediately reduce the destructive impacts of the mining and critical minerals sector. “This conference and workshop have revealed undeniable field facts, clarifying our commitment to synergizing and advocating for mining and nickel industry issues. We are determined to fight for more justice and sustainable nickel governance that respects local communities’ rights and protects the environment.”

“We urge the new Prabowo-Gibran government to listen directly to the voices of affected residents and take concrete steps in formulating inclusive and responsible policies. Nickel down streaming must not benefit only a few parties but also protect community rights and ensure environmental sustainability for the common good,” Linda added.

Projection of Nickel Demand and Environmental Impacts Remain Unclear in National Planning
The planning for nickel demand in Indonesia has not been adequately clarified in national strategic documents, including the National Long-Term Development Plan (RPJPN), the National Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMN), and other derivative documents. Despite the rapid growth of the nickel industry, attention to environmental impacts, especially carbon emissions, remains minimal. This is evident in the weak environmental oversight of the industry, which is causing negative impacts on ecosystems.

The ResponsiBank Indonesia coalition highlights the worsening situation due to the massive financing of the nickel sector, supported by regulations that position nickel as a key component of the green energy transition. “Banks, as the lenders to companies, play a role as catalysts and accelerators of financing. However, reckless exploitation of nickel is causing environmental damage and social conflicts. Banks need to integrate responsible financing practices that support human rights and environmental preservation,” said Herni Ramdlaningrum of the ResponsiBank Indonesia coalition.

Monitoring nickel mining companies could be more optimal, especially at the regional level. Provincial governments’ limited authority and overlapping policies between central and regional governments exacerbate the situation. As a result, environmental law enforcement could be more effective.

Furthermore, the 2020 Coal and Mining Law (UU Minerba) and the 2022 Job Creation Law, which centralizes operational permit authority at the national level, have restricted civil society’s ability to conduct oversight. The mechanisms for restoring affected communities are often stalled, especially in areas where local governments have conflicts of interest due to their ownership stakes in nickel mining industries.

“The nickel industry does play an important role in supporting the energy transition, but the rapid development of this sector must be balanced with serious attention to environmental and social impacts. Weaknesses in national strategic planning, coupled with governance that is far from transparent and poor oversight of the nickel mining industry, are worsening the ongoing environmental crisis,” said Meliana Lumbantoruan, Deputy Director of Publish What You Pay (PWYP) Indonesia.

The government needs to strengthen the governance of the nickel sector by increasing transparency, accountability, and coordination between agencies at both the national and regional levels. In addition, the active involvement of civil society in oversight must be ensured so that industrial activities are carried out more responsibly and restoration for affected communities can be achieved more effectively,” Meliana added.

Olisias Gultom, Director of the Sahita Institute (HINTS), emphasized, “All stakeholders need to recognize that corrupt practices have contributed to environmental damage and marginalized local communities in this industry. Furthermore, the lack of commitment to providing decent livelihoods for workers is alarming. The development of downstream industries must align with the principles of humanity and social justice. Immediate action is needed before larger mistakes severely damage all aspects of life.”

Neglected Social, Economic, and Employment Impacts

The rapid development of the nickel industry is different from local government commitments to meet the energy and food needs of the communities in these areas. The purchasing power of the people continues to decline due to policies that do not favor the smallholder population. This situation is worsened by the need for more tangible efforts to rehabilitate the environment after ecological disasters. This leads to the loss of essential livelihoods, such as fishing, and limited alternative job opportunities for communities affected by nickel mining and downstream activities. Despite the presence of mining companies in their regions, the economic contribution to improving local welfare is barely felt. The enormous profits these companies earn are accompanied by the transfer of social and economic risks to residents.

Wasi Gede, Director of INKRISPENA, emphasized that a welfare approach cannot coexist with the militaristic and violent methods currently dominant in nickel industry areas. “It is impossible for farmers, workers, or residents in mining and critical mineral processing areas to thrive as long as the government and business world continue to prioritize militarism and violence in resolving the issues that arise.”

Strengthening Indigenous communities and local populations is crucial in facing critical mineral industries in Indonesia. This is particularly important in providing clear information about the presence of industries in their villages and regions. According to Rudiansyah from Yayasan Masyarakat Kehutanan Lestari (YMKL), one of the efforts needed is to enhance communities’ understanding of the concept of “Free, Prior, and Informed Consent” (FPIC).

“The issue of Indigenous and local communities’ rights is not limited to land compensation. It also includes a deep understanding of why, for what, and the consequences of critical mineral industry projects for their lives. Ultimately, they are the ones who are first and foremost exploited—whether they have already been, are currently, or will be part of this industry’s concessions,” explained Rudiansyah.

Thus, a joint effort between the government, communities, and all stakeholders is essential to ensure that communities’ rights are protected and that they receive comprehensive information about the impact of critical mineral industries on their environment and livelihoods.

In the employment sector, the weak enforcement of Health and Safety (K3) standards highlights the lack of corporate responsibility for workers’ safety. Many workers do not receive adequate protection, and existing legal regulations are outdated and irrelevant to the industry’s growth. Wage discrimination is also glaring, especially between male and female workers.

Richard, the leader of the Tanah Merdeka Foundation (YTM), stated, “The high work intensity with a three-shift system in the nickel industry not only worsens the social and economic conditions of local communities but also causes various Occupational Diseases (PAK). Workers often suffer from excessive fatigue, sleep disorders, and chronic health problems such as respiratory issues and musculoskeletal pain, exacerbated by the lack of enforcement of Health and Safety standards (K3).”

“In addition, unequal wages and the lack of healthcare protection for workers reflect the weakness of labor policies that should protect their well-being. While companies reap huge profits, communities are left to bear the increasing social and health burdens caused by industrial activities,” he continued.

Indonesia’s rapidly growing nickel industry attracts investors, making the business sector working in this field highly supported. “Investment flows should not only provide facilities for companies to run their businesses but also have a multiplier effect, such as providing fair economic benefits, access to decent work, and improving the welfare of local communities,” said Herni Ramdlaningrum from the ResponsiBank Indonesia Coalition.

 

Environmental Destruction, Biodiversity Loss, and Serious Health Threats

The “booming” of the critical minerals industry, promoted as a solution for energy transition, creates new crises. Instead of transitioning to clean energy, the government continues to approve the construction of captive (off-grid) coal-fired power plants in nickel industrial areas. As coal is one of the leading causes of climate change, this decision ignores the following environmental and social disasters. This demonstrates a total disregard for environmental sustainability.

In this context, Ahmad Ashov Birry, Program Director of Trend Asia, emphasized, “The practice of critical mineral exploitation in Indonesia, which seems to know no bounds, clearly overlooks the crises we are currently facing. Indonesia and the rest of the world face climate, biodiversity, and pollution crises. These are all interconnected and transboundary and have long-term consequences. The Indonesian government must rethink its critical mineral exploitation strategy to avoid worsening these crises.”

Nickel mining activities have caused massive deforestation, severe water and air pollution, and the extinction of biodiversity that supports ecosystems. This environmental destruction threatens flora and fauna and exacerbates the risk of inevitable ecological disasters—such as floods, landslides, and soil degradation—that make the environment uninhabitable.

However, the worst impacts are felt directly by the surrounding communities. Pollution has triggered a severe health crisis. Diseases like acute respiratory infections (ISPA), widespread skin diseases, eye irritation, and poor sanitation, which worsens childhood stunting, are clear evidence. Public health is being sacrificed for industrial profit, while both central and local governments and companies turn a blind eye to the growing suffering.

Richard, Yayasan Tanah Merdeka (YTM) Director, stated, “Dirty greenwashing practices are rampant in the nickel industry. Victims are falling every day. The environmentally friendly narrative pushed by the government for nickel investments contrasts starkly with the reality. In the field, we see no trace of good mining practices. The people are now facing a water crisis, respiratory diseases, floods, and landslides.”

Media Contact :
Annisa N. Fadhilah – Tuk Indonesia, 087884446640

Arie Utami – Indonesia Cerah, 08111770920

 

The Communiqué of Conference are here

Documentation of the Conference are here

 

Organizations and communities involved:

 

Aksi Ekologi dan Emansipasi Rakyat (AEER) Pemberdayaan Perempuan Kepala Keluarga (PEKKA)
Auriga Nusantara Perempuan Mahardhika
Solidaritas Perempuan Kendari Perhimpunan Pembela Masyarakat Adat Nusantara (PPMAN)
Solidaritas Perempuan Palu Pusat Penelitian Lingkungan Hidup (PPLH) Universitas Tadulako
Solidaritas Perempuan Sintuwu Raya Poso PWYP Indonesia
CNV Internationaal ResponsiBank Indonesia
Djokosoetono Research Center (DRC) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia Sahita Institute – HINTS
Fakawele Project Satya Bumi
FIKEP-KSBSI SBIMI
Ford Foundation Sekretariat Nasional Solidaritas Perempuan
Forest Watch Indonesia (FWI) Solidar Suisse
Forum Ambunu Bersatu (Morowali) SPIM
FPBI SPIM-KPBI MOROWALI
FPE SPN Morowali
FSPMI Tara Climate Foundation
ICW Tifa Foundation
Indonesian Center for Environmental Law (ICEL) Transparency International Indonesia
Institut Kajian Krisis dan Strategi Pembangunan Alternatif (Inkrispena) Trend Asia
Institute for National and Democracy Studies (INDIES) TuK INDONESIA
International NGO Forum on Indonesian Development (INFID) WALHI Maluku Utara
Jaringan Advokasi Tambang (JATAM) Sulawesi Tengah WALHI Sulawesi Selatan
Koalisi Perempuan Indonesia WALHI Sulawesi Tengah
Koalisi Save Sagea WALHI Sulawesi Tenggara
Konfederasi KASBI Yayasan Ambeua Helewo Ruru
KPA Sulawesi Tengah Yayasan Indonesia CERAH
LBH Makassar Yayasan Kompas Peduli Hutan (KOMIU)
Lokataru Foundation Yayasan Masyarakat Kehutanan Lestari (YMKL)
Masyarakat Desa Tompira Yayasan Merah Putih (YMP) Sulawesi Tengah
Masyarakat Komunitas Torobulu Yayasan Pikul
Nexus3 Foundation Yayasan Tanah Merdeka (YTM)
Solidaritas Perempuan

 

Previous Post

Desakan Masyarakat Sipil Indonesia dan Eropa Agar PerundinganIndonesia-EU CEPA Tak Dilanjutkan

Next Post

Sikap Tegas Pemberantasan Korupsi Prabowo-Gibran Syarat Realisasi Hilirisasi Berkedaulatan Rakyat

Editorial

Editorial

Discussion about this post

Follow Us

  • Dunia sedang mengalami perubahan besar dalam konstelasi ekonomi-politik global. Ini ditandai dengan kemunduran relatif AS sebagai kekuatan imperialis utama bersama mitra strategisnya di Barat, perlambatan ekonomi kapitalis sejak krisis Keuangan Besar 2008–yang diperparah dengan pandemi covid-19, dan munculnya kekuatan-kekuatan alternatif seperti Tiongkok, Rusia, dan negara-negara lain yang disebut sebagai ‘penguatan’ Global South dengan visi yang condong mengarah pada tatanan dunia multipolar. Tentu, terlalu dini untuk mendeklarasikan kekalahan AS dan  Barat di saat kekuatan tersebut masih memegang kendali kuat pada bidang militer dan teknologi. 

Begitu pula perang tarif yang dilancarkan oleh Donald Trump perlu dipertimbangkan sebagai tujuan imperialis AS untuk menegaskan kembali  kekuatannya. Akan tetapi, kebangkitan kekuatan Global South tidak bisa diremehkan, mengingat rata-rata pertumbuhan ekonomi negara-negara tersebut mencerminkan kemampuan mereka sebagai pemain penting dalam percaturan ekonomi-politik global.

Perubahan besar memicu perdebatan tentang arah masa depan tatanan dunia. Dalam konteks ini, multipolaritas yang diaspirasikan Global South sering dipandang sebagai peluang untuk membuat tatanan global yang lebih demokratis. Inisiatif seperti BRICS+ dan OPEC+, kerjasama ekonomi Selatan-Selatan, serta diplomasi energi dan pangan menjadi sinyal dari upaya negara-negara periferi untuk membangun tatanan yang lebih setara. Namun, pertanyaan penting muncul: apakah ini benar-benar menjanjikan pembebasan, atau hanya mengganti wajah kekuasaan global yang tetap bersifat eksploitatif? Dalam praktiknya, kerja sama ini kerap tidak lepas dari kepentingan elite negara dan korporasi besar, serta belum sepenuhnya mengakar pada gerakan rakyat yang sejati.

Dalam waktu yang sama, imperialisme global juga ikut menyesuaikan dirinya. Salah satu wajah barunya adalah melalui apa yang disebut sebagai green colonialism — yakni kolonialisasi dalam bentuk menggunakan proyek-proyek transisi energi "hijau" yang dibaliknya justru memperparah perampasan tanah, penggusuran masyarakat adat, dan pencaplokan sumber daya alam oleh perusahaan.
  • Sering mendengar pepatah "Jangan tanyakan apa yang negara berikan padamu, tapi tanyakan apa yang negara (Pemerintah Indonesia) berikan kepada Paman Sam...😁"

Negeri kita sejak dahulu terkenal dengan budaya ramah tamahnya, kali ini kembali terbukti dengan keramahannya kepada Investasi asing dalam hal ini Amerika Serikat.

Say good bye to "TKDN"
  • Upaya menghapus hambatan tarif tersebut merupakan salah satu ketentuan yang tercantum dalam Perjanjian Perdagangan Timbal Balik (Agreement on Reciprocal Trade) antara Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat.

Jika ini benar-benar terjadi tentu dampak yang akan timbul bagai pil pahit yang harus ditelan oleh industri yang ada di Indonesia. Membanjirnya produk impor asal Amerika Serikat semakin membanjiri komoditas yang sudah penuh sesak dengan komoditas asal negara lain dan semakin memojokkan kondisi industri Indonesia semakin ke tepi jurang.

Apakah memang sudah waktunya mengibarkan bendera One Piece?

#onepice
  • Pengelolaan data pribadi masyarakat Indonesia oleh perusahaan-perusahaan Amerika Serikat ini merupakan salah satu hal yang disepakati sebagai bagian dari kesepakatan penetapan tarif resiprokal 19 persen untuk Indonesia. 

Gedung Putih menyebut pengelolaan data pribadi masyarakat merupakan bagian dari komitmen Indonesia untuk mengatasi hambatan yang berdampak pada perdagangan, jasa, dan investasi digital Amerika Serikat. Disebutkan bahwa perusahaan-perusahaan Amerika Serikat telah mengusahakan reformasi itu selama bertahun-tahun.

Masalah besar atas arus data lintas negara adalah korporasi besar bidang teknologi sangat diuntungkan dari perluasan digitalisasi ekonomi dengan mengendalikan data di dunia global. “Siapa yang mengontrol data pada dasarnya dapat mendominasi domain digital. Dan mereka menginginkan hak mutlak untuk mengontrol data yang dihasilkan dalam bisnis. Saat ini mereka juga melakukan lobi mempertahankan monopoli data” ujar Olisias Gultom. Jangan sampai kesepakatan ini menjadi kekhawatiran bersama dimulainya Kolonialisme Data yang dilakukan oleh Amerika Serikat.
  • “Indonesia akan membayar tarif 19 persen kepada Amerika Serikat untuk semua barang yang mereka ekspor ke negara kita,” kata Trump melalui media sosialnya, Kamis (16/7). Selain soal tarif, kesepakatan yang diteken kedua negara juga mencakup sejumlah komitmen dagang Indonesia terhadap Amerika Serikat. Trump mengungkapkan Indonesia akan membeli komoditas energi dari AS senilai 15 miliar dolar AS, serta produk agrikultur senilai 4,5 miliar dolar AS. Ia juga menyatakan Indonesia telah sepakat membeli 50 unit pesawat Boeing terbaru, yang sebagian besar merupakan tipe Boeing 777.

Adapun Trump juga menyebut bahwa Indonesia telah berkomitmen untuk menghapus seluruh hambatan perdagangan, baik tarif maupun non-tarif, bagi produk-produk asal Amerika Serikat yang masuk ke Indonesia.

Pentingnya kehati-hatian dalam setiap perjanjian dagang dengan negara besar seperti Amerika Serikat agar Indonesia tidak terjebak dalam pola dagang yang merugikan secara struktural, serta prinsip kemandirian dan daya saing nasional harus menjadi prioritas utama dalam setiap kebijakan perdagangan internasional yang ditempuh pemerintah. Dan semoga perjanjian dagang ini tidak mengarah kepada kolonialisme modern.
  • Transformasi ekonomi global saat ini dijalankan melalui perubahan model industri, dari berbasis fosil ke arah industri hijau. Agenda transisi energi—yang diklaim sebagai solusi krisis iklim—sesungguhnya merupakan bagian dari politik industri global yang menggunakan isu energi terbarukan dan teknologi hijau sebagai sektor strategis. 

Tujuan sesungguhnya untuk merespons krisis kapitalisme dan mempertahankan dominasi industri oleh negara-negara utama. Narasi “hijau” yang dikembangkan ini, dibelakangnya terdapat skema perdagangan, keuangan, dan investasi yang memperkuat ketimpangan ekonomi global dan memperpanjang relasi neo-kolonial antara negara utara dan negara-negara selatan.

Simposium ini dilakukan oleh Panitia Bersama (Hints, KASBI, KPR, KSN, Sempro, PWYP, Sembada dan SMI) di Indonesia dalam rangka menyambut pertemuan internasional Beyond Development Working Group. Acara yang berlangsung tanggal 1 – 3 Juli 2025 ini bertujuan untuk berdiskusi, saling tukar pendapat dan analisis organisasi terkait Kebijakan Industri di Indonesia terdampak atas Transformasi Ekonomi Hijau yang merubah geopolitik dan geoekonomi global.
  • Perang antar satu negara dengan negara lain sudah tentu yang menjadi korbannya adalah rakyat di masing-masing negara tersebut.

Perang yang terkadang memperebutkan sumber daya alam, eksistensi negaranya, memperluas teritori, bahkan hanya kepentingan segelintir elit dan konglomerat negaranya.

Stop Perang!! Saatnya bangun kerjasama dan solidaritas sesama rakyat internasional melawan Imperialisme.
  • WTO (Word Trade Organization) adalah sebuah organisasi internasional yang mengatur perdagangan internasional. Tujuan utama WTO adalah untuk membuka perdagangan antarnegara dengan mengurangi atau menghilangkan hambatan tarif dan non-tarif. Keputusan di WTO diambil melalui konsensus atau kesepakatan bersama dari seluruh negara anggota.

Amerika Serikat dahulu adalah pelopor utama lahirnya sistem perdagangan multilateral berbasis aturan melalui WTO. Namun kini, justru AS yang kerap bertindak sepihak, melemahkan institusi yang dahulu ia perjuangkan. Dari penarikan diri terhadap kewajiban multilateral hingga memblokir fungsi Badan Banding WTO, serta yang terkini melakukan kebijakan perang tarif impor dengan “sesuka hatinya” terhadap negara lain yang juga sesama negara anggota WTO.

Lalu apa fungsi dari WTO saat ini?? Mengapa tidak dibubarkan saja sekalian??

#endwto

© 2022 - Sahita Institute

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Campaign
    • Trade Justice
    • Digital Justice
    • Energy Transtition
  • Collective Idea
    • Visual Movement
    • Article
  • News
  • Publication

© 2022 Sahita Institute